THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANOJBHAI BHARATBHAI VASAVA — 407/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030006522026
Filing Number
407/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
407/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061250974
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANOJBHAI BHARATBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted Manojbhai Bharatbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchnama (official record) lacked proper corroboration, the investigating officer's testimony was unreliable, and the chemical testing of seized samples was not adequately documented, rendering the prosecution's case fatally deficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 407/2026
The court acquitted Manojbhai Bharatbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchnama (official record) lacked proper corroboration, the investigating officer's testimony was unreliable, and the chemical testing of seized samples was not adequately documented, rendering the prosecution's case fatally deficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts