THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANITASINGH PANKAJSINGH SUGRIVSINGH Advocate - A B SIPAI — 119/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030003412025
Filing Number
119/2025
Filing Date
16-Jan-2025
Registration No
119/2025
Registration Date
16-Jan-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021241288
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANITASINGH PANKAJSINGH SUGRIVSINGH Advocate - A B SIPAI
-
2.PANKAJSINGH SUGRIVSINGH
Adv. A B SIPAI
-
3.SANGITA ABHILAS JAGJAHIR
Adv. A B SIPAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 119/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all accused persons under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 54, and 135 (BNS equivalent), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. The State's prosecution failed to establish a direct link between the accused and alleged criminal conduct, relying on weak circumstantial evidence without corroborating witness testimony or credible documentation. Key Reasoning: The judge noted that while witness statements were recorded, they remained vague regarding the accused's involvement. The prosecution could not produce concrete evidence demonstrating the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the court rejected attempts to construct a case based on incomplete investigative records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 119/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all accused persons under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 54, and 135 (BNS equivalent), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. The State's prosecution failed to establish a direct link between the accused and alleged criminal conduct, relying on weak circumstantial evidence without corroborating witness testimony or credible documentation. Key Reasoning: The judge noted that while witness statements were recorded, they remained vague regarding the accused's involvement. The prosecution could not produce concrete evidence demonstrating the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the court rejected attempts to construct a case based on incomplete investigative records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts