THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TARABEN CHANDUBHAI DAHYABHAI VASAVA — 99/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030001712026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199004250946

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARABEN CHANDUBHAI DAHYABHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted respondent Taraben Chandubhai Dahyabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the prosecution's case. The court noted that the panchnama (seizure document) lacked proper authentication, the samples' testing reports were not produced, and the police witnesses could not credibly establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal under CrPC Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted respondent Taraben Chandubhai Dahyabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the prosecution's case. The court noted that the panchnama (seizure document) lacked proper authentication, the samples' testing reports were not produced, and the police witnesses could not credibly establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal under CrPC Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case