THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAMLABEN SOMABHAI HARIBHAI VASAVA — 98/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030001702026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

98/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199004250943

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLABEN SOMABHAI HARIBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused (Kamlaben Somabhai Haribhai Vasava) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation, particularly regarding the credibility of the panchnama (official record). The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt due to unreliable witness testimony and improper investigative procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused (Kamlaben Somabhai Haribhai Vasava) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation, particularly regarding the credibility of the panchnama (official record). The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt due to unreliable witness testimony and improper investigative procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case