ANKIT RAMESHCHANDRA MODI POWER OF ATORNEY HOLDER A.R.SHROF PEDHI vs KHALIDBHAI VALIBHAI PATEL Advocate - S U PATEL — 10943/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH020121902021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
10943/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
10943/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
CIVIL COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANKIT RAMESHCHANDRA MODI POWER OF ATORNEY HOLDER A.R.SHROF PEDHI
Adv. H.P.PARMAR
Respondent(s)
KHALIDBHAI VALIBHAI PATEL Advocate - S U PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 10943/2021 Petitioner: Ankit Rameshchandra Modi (through POA holder A.R. Shrof Pedhi) Respondent: Khalidkhai Valibhai Patel Outcome: The accused (respondent) was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment with a fine. The accused is ordered to pay compensation to the petitioner within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if the compensation payment fails. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 10943/2021 Petitioner: Ankit Rameshchandra Modi (through POA holder A.R. Shrof Pedhi) Respondent: Khalidkhai Valibhai Patel Outcome: The accused (respondent) was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment with a fine. The accused is ordered to pay compensation to the petitioner within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if the compensation payment fails. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts