PRATIKKUMAR ARUNBHAI MISHTRY PROP/OF RAJ RAJESHWARI FINANCE vs MEMAN SAHINABANU ABDUL KADAR — 7016/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 16th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH020119102025
Filing Number
7016/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
7016/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRATIKKUMAR ARUNBHAI MISHTRY PROP/OF RAJ RAJESHWARI FINANCE
Adv. H P PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEMAN SAHINABANU ABDUL KADAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the case on the ground that the defendant's address had changed and summons could not be served for an extended period. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bharuch ordered the withdrawal of the petition under Mark-04, finding the case too old and the petitioner unwilling to pursue it further, with no prospect of successful service of summons on the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
06-May-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
26-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7016/2025
The court dismissed the case on the ground that the defendant's address had changed and summons could not be served for an extended period. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bharuch ordered the withdrawal of the petition under Mark-04, finding the case too old and the petitioner unwilling to pursue it further, with no prospect of successful service of summons on the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts