ASHOKBHAI NANJIBHAI SHELADIYA vs YOGESHKUMAR NARPATSINH GOHIL Advocate - A T PANWALA — 3/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 16,21,22,34,38,39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH020012502023
Filing Number
3/2023
Filing Date
30-Jan-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
30-Jan-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOKBHAI NANJIBHAI SHELADIYA
Adv. M G PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.YOGESHKUMAR NARPATSINH GOHIL Advocate - A T PANWALA
-
2.AKSHAYKUMAR NARPATSINH GOHIL
-
3.LAXMIBEN NARPATSINH GOHIL
-
4.NARSANGBHAI HIRABHAI GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
5.RAVINDRASINH NARSINH GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
6.KALPESHSINH NARSINH GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
7.AJITBHAI HIRABHAI GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
8.DAMYATIBEN AJITSINH GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
9.ANKITABEN AJITSINH GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
-
10.NIRMALSINH AJITSINH GOHIL
Adv. R M PRAJAPATI
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
29-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
19-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
06-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
25-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff is allowed. Defendants 1-3 are restrained from alienating, transferring, mortgaging, leasing, or dealing with the disputed agricultural property (4,533 sq. meters in Tavra village, Bharuch) in any manner until further court orders or final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
02-Aug-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
15-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
05-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-May-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
05-Apr-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Mar-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Nov-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
27-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2024
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
26-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
18-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
15-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
29-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
12-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
07-Jul-2023
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
08-Jun-2023
Written Statement/Reply
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
20-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2023
Summary The temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff is allowed. Defendants 1-3 are restrained from alienating, transferring, mortgaging, leasing, or dealing with the disputed agricultural property (4,533 sq. meters in Tavra village, Bharuch) in any manner until further court orders or final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts