GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHER MAHMAD ISMAIL SINDHI Advocate - D G THAKOR — 301/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,325,326,504,506(2),114,110,120(B). Status: FRAMING OF CHARGE. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH020005162024

FRAMING OF CHARGE

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

301/2024

Filing Date

11-01-2024

Registration No

301/2024

Registration Date

11-01-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

FIR Details

FIR Number

1119903830871

Police Station

NABIPUR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,324,325,326,504,506(2),114,110,120(B)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHER MAHMAD ISMAIL SINDHI Advocate - D G THAKOR

MOUSIN ALTAF SINDHI

Adv. D G THAKOR

SOKATKHAN JUMAKHAN PATHAN

Adv. D G THAKOR

YAAR MAHMMAD ALLI MAHAMAD SINDHI

Adv. D G THAKOR

FARID @ HAFEJI YUSUF PATEL(SARNAWALA)

Adv. D G THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

25-05-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE

04-05-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE

13-04-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE

12-03-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE

12-02-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE

Interim Orders

12-07-2024
ORDER

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 301/2024 Outcome: The application for further investigation was rejected. The complainant sought additional investigation into a physical assault case (involving charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 504, 506(2), 114, 110, 120B and Gujarat Police Act section 135), alleging the original investigation was incomplete and that key evidence like CCTV footage was not collected. The court found the complainant was actually seeking "reinvestigation" by a senior officer rather than supplemental investigation, which exceeds the magistrate's authority under CrPC section 173(8). The application also lacked supporting affidavit and pleaded numerous investigative lapses that would require fresh investigation rather than further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 301/2024 Outcome: The application for further investigation was rejected. The complainant sought additional investigation into a physical assault case (involving charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 504, 506(2), 114, 110, 120B and Gujarat Police Act section 135), alleging the original investigation was incomplete and that key evidence like CCTV footage was not collected. The court found the complainant was actually seeking "reinvestigation" by a senior officer rather than supplemental investigation, which exceeds the magistrate's authority under CrPC section 173(8). The application also lacked supporting affidavit and pleaded numerous investigative lapses that would require fresh investigation rather than further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHARUCH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case