GEN MAHMAD NAEEM MUSTAK vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 103/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBH020004572026

Case disposed

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

GEN MAHMAD NAEEM MUSTAK

Adv. M M JET

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

28-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

23-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

13-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNS to release ₹19,798 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit in an IDBI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The applicant, a cyber fraud victim, received the Palej Police Inspector's support for the release, and with no FIR filed or arrests made, the court ordered the amount returned to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNS to release ₹19,798 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit in an IDBI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The applicant, a cyber fraud victim, received the Palej Police Inspector's support for the release, and with no FIR filed or arrests made, the court ordered the amount returned to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHARUCH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case