GEN MAHMAD NAEEM MUSTAK vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 103/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH020004572026
Filing Number
103/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GEN MAHMAD NAEEM MUSTAK
Adv. M M JET
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 23-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 13-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNS to release ₹19,798 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit in an IDBI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The applicant, a cyber fraud victim, received the Palej Police Inspector's support for the release, and with no FIR filed or arrests made, the court ordered the amount returned to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNS to release ₹19,798 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit in an IDBI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The applicant, a cyber fraud victim, received the Palej Police Inspector's support for the release, and with no FIR filed or arrests made, the court ordered the amount returned to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts