RAKHDA MOHSIN YAKUB vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 96/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH020004492026
Filing Number
96/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
96/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKHDA MOHSIN YAKUB
Adv. S M PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 96/2026 Summary The court allowed Rakhda Mohsin Yakub's application to release Rs. 21,487.25 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit after the applicant fell victim to cyber fraud. The court ordered the banks to defreeze and transfer the amount to the applicant's SBI account upon furnishing a surety bond equal to 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to the condition that the applicant must return the funds if any other claimant proves a legitimate interest in the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2026
Case 96/2026 Summary The court allowed Rakhda Mohsin Yakub's application to release Rs. 21,487.25 that was frozen by the Cyber Crime Unit after the applicant fell victim to cyber fraud. The court ordered the banks to defreeze and transfer the amount to the applicant's SBI account upon furnishing a surety bond equal to 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to the condition that the applicant must return the funds if any other claimant proves a legitimate interest in the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts