STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARTH PARESHBHAI JOSHI Advocate - P P CHAUHAN — 102/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379A(3),504. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 25th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBH010034702023
Filing Number
102/2023
Filing Date
08-Dec-2023
Registration No
102/2023
Registration Date
08-Dec-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199001230140
Police Station
BHARUCH CITY C DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. N M MISTRY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARTH PARESHBHAI JOSHI Advocate - P P CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Sessions Case No. 102/2023 Court Decision: The Sessions Court in Bharuch acquitted defendant Parth Pareshbhai Joshi of charges under IPC Section 379(A)(3) (snatching) but convicted him under Section 504 (insulting conduct intended to provoke breach of peace). He was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹15,000 (with one month imprisonment as default) and ordered to pay ₹13,000 compensation to the complainant from the fine amount. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that on February 20, 2023, the defendant (her estranged husband) followed her on a scooter, hurled abusive language at her, questioned her phone conversations, and snatched her mobile phone worth ₹38,000. The court found insufficient evidence of theft intent but established the defendant's insulting and abusive conduct toward the complainant's character, warranting conviction under Section 504. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
21-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
22-May-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2023
Summary of Sessions Case No. 102/2023 Court Decision: The Sessions Court in Bharuch acquitted defendant Parth Pareshbhai Joshi of charges under IPC Section 379(A)(3) (snatching) but convicted him under Section 504 (insulting conduct intended to provoke breach of peace). He was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹15,000 (with one month imprisonment as default) and ordered to pay ₹13,000 compensation to the complainant from the fine amount. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that on February 20, 2023, the defendant (her estranged husband) followed her on a scooter, hurled abusive language at her, questioned her phone conversations, and snatched her mobile phone worth ₹38,000. The court found insufficient evidence of theft intent but established the defendant's insulting and abusive conduct toward the complainant's character, warranting conviction under Section 504. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts