MUSTAKALI KHALILUR RAHMAN vs SUNILBHAI RAGHAVBHAI CHAUHAN — 423/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBH010029682022

Filing Number

423/2022

Filing Date

08-Oct-2022

Registration No

423/2022

Registration Date

08-Oct-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAKALI KHALILUR RAHMAN

    Adv. C R INTWALA

  2. 2.REHANABEGAM MUSTAKALI

    Adv. C R INTWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNILBHAI RAGHAVBHAI CHAUHAN

  2. 2.JIGARBHAI SURESHBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. H V AHIR

  3. 3.NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD D.O-1

    Adv. N R MODI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: MACP/423/2022 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.16,14,860 in compensation to the parents of a 19-year-old motorcycle rider killed in a collision with a rash-driven Maruti Van, finding the driver solely negligent with no contributory negligence on the deceased. The insurance company's defense regarding the driver's lack of valid driving license was rejected as it failed to prove breach of policy conditions or the owner's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 01-Sep-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 24-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 03-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 05-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 22-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 08-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 27-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 07-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 09-Jul-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 13-May-2024

    Service Of Process

    Principal District Judge

  29. 04-Mar-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  30. 10-Jan-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  31. 20-Nov-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  32. 13-Sep-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  33. 06-Jul-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  34. 19-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  35. 01-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  36. 09-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  37. 19-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 08-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 423/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACP/423/2022 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.16,14,860 in compensation to the parents of a 19-year-old motorcycle rider killed in a collision with a rash-driven Maruti Van, finding the driver solely negligent with no contributory negligence on the deceased. The insurance company's defense regarding the driver's lack of valid driving license was rejected as it failed to prove breach of policy conditions or the owner's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case