STATE OF GUJARAT vs ARSHAD USMAN HAFEJI SULEMAN PATEL Advocate - M VORA — 53/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,308. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJBH010022012024

Filing Number

53/2024

Filing Date

01-Aug-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

01-Aug-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199001230961

Police Station

BHARUCH CITY C DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,308
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,3,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. N M MISTRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARSHAD USMAN HAFEJI SULEMAN PATEL Advocate - M VORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Sessions Case No. 53/2024 The court acquitted defendant Arshad Usman Hafeji Suleman Patel of charges under IPC sections 279, 308 and MV Act sections 177, 184, 181, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond doubt that he performed dangerous motorcycle stunts on Narmada Bridge on July 21, 2023. Critical evidentiary gaps—including the rider's face not visible in the viral video, no helmet number visible, unverified video source, and lack of proper investigation—rendered the case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  15. 21-Jun-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  16. 23-May-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  17. 03-May-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  18. 29-Mar-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  19. 01-Mar-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  21. 07-Jan-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  22. 05-Nov-2024

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  23. 23-Sep-2024

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal District Judge

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Sessions Case No. 53/2024 The court acquitted defendant Arshad Usman Hafeji Suleman Patel of charges under IPC sections 279, 308 and MV Act sections 177, 184, 181, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond doubt that he performed dangerous motorcycle stunts on Narmada Bridge on July 21, 2023. Critical evidentiary gaps—including the rider's face not visible in the viral video, no helmet number visible, unverified video source, and lack of proper investigation—rendered the case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case