PUSHPADEVI SANJIVKUMAR SINH vs PRAMODKUMAR MAHATAMSINH — 311/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBH010021272019

Filing Number

311/2019

Filing Date

26-Jul-2019

Registration No

311/2019

Registration Date

26-Jul-2019

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

25-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPADEVI SANJIVKUMAR SINH

    Adv. R.C.GOHIL

  2. 2.MINOR SHIVANSHUKUMAR SANJIVKUMAR SINH

    Adv. H.S.KHARVA

  3. 3.MINOR SHREYANSHKUMAR SANJIVKUMAR SINH

    Adv. R C GOHIL

  4. 4.MAHATAMSINH SURAJSINH

    Adv. R C GOHIL

  5. 5.KULPATIDEVI MAHTAMSINH

    Adv. R C GOHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAMODKUMAR MAHATAMSINH

  2. 2.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. C.B.MODI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PUSHPADEVI SANJIVKUMAR SINH v. PRAMODKUMAR MAHATAMSINH (MACP/311/2019) Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,23,05,210 (approx. Rs.1.23 crore) to the claimants, rejecting the insurance company's defense that the deceased was driving. The tribunal found the driver Pramodkumar liable for rash and negligent driving after an animal suddenly entered the road, causing the car to collide with a roadside parapet. The tribunal discounted a forensic expert's reconstruction report prepared four years after the accident without site inspection, finding it lacked conclusive value against the claimants' consistent testimony and documentary evidence of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 03-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 15-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 04-Sep-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 30-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 02-Jun-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 20-May-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 09-May-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 18-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 17-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 02-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  31. 01-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 27-Mar-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  33. 06-Mar-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 20-Feb-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 30-Jan-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  36. 08-Jan-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  37. 18-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 17-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  39. 07-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  40. 06-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  41. 02-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  42. 07-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  43. 22-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  44. 30-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  45. 19-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 04-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 13-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 19-Jul-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 28-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  50. 01-Apr-2024

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  51. 12-Feb-2024

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  52. 27-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  53. 18-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  54. 11-Sep-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  55. 21-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  56. 30-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  57. 05-Apr-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  58. 25-Jan-2023

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  59. 05-Dec-2022

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  60. 10-Oct-2022

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  61. 12-Sep-2022

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  62. 06-Jul-2022

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  63. 27-Apr-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  64. 09-Mar-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  65. 17-Jan-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  66. 22-Nov-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  67. 13-Sep-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  68. 05-Jul-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  69. 12-Apr-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  70. 10-Feb-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  71. 16-Dec-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  72. 21-Oct-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  73. 09-Sep-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  74. 22-Jul-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  75. 27-May-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  76. 26-Mar-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  77. 04-Mar-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  78. 29-Jan-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  79. 23-Dec-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  80. 09-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  81. 26-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 311/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PUSHPADEVI SANJIVKUMAR SINH v. PRAMODKUMAR MAHATAMSINH (MACP/311/2019) Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,23,05,210 (approx. Rs.1.23 crore) to the claimants, rejecting the insurance company's defense that the deceased was driving. The tribunal found the driver Pramodkumar liable for rash and negligent driving after an animal suddenly entered the road, causing the car to collide with a roadside parapet. The tribunal discounted a forensic expert's reconstruction report prepared four years after the accident without site inspection, finding it lacked conclusive value against the claimants' consistent testimony and documentary evidence of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case