MANHARBHAI K PANCHAL vs ASHOKBHAI GIRDHARBHAI SARMA Advocate - I.I.PATEL — 275/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 27th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBH010021162025
Filing Number
275/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
275/2025
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
2-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANHARBHAI K PANCHAL
Adv. G D VYAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOKBHAI GIRDHARBHAI SARMA Advocate - I.I.PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 275/2025 The court set aside and quashed the conviction and sentence of appellant Manharbhai K. Panchal for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, based on a compromise settlement between the parties. The respondent/complainant confirmed receipt of the full disputed cheque amount and had no objection to the accused's acquittal and discharge. The court waived compounding costs, finding it just and proper given the settled dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
For R&P
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
For R&P
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
For R&P
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
For R&P
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Notice To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Notice To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Notice To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 275/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 275/2025 The court set aside and quashed the conviction and sentence of appellant Manharbhai K. Panchal for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, based on a compromise settlement between the parties. The respondent/complainant confirmed receipt of the full disputed cheque amount and had no objection to the accused's acquittal and discharge. The court waived compounding costs, finding it just and proper given the settled dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts