VIJAYBHAI JASHUBHAI PATEL vs FALGUNIBEN WD/O CHETANBHAI PATEL Advocate - A V KHAMBHATA — 43/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBH010019942024

Filing Number

43/2024

Filing Date

06-Jul-2024

Registration No

43/2024

Registration Date

06-Jul-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI JASHUBHAI PATEL

    Adv. G V JATTA

  2. 2.SANGITABEN VIJAYBHAI PATEL

    Adv. G V JATTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FALGUNIBEN WD/O CHETANBHAI PATEL Advocate - A V KHAMBHATA

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Cri.Revi.Appln. No. 43/2024 Court Decision: The Sessions Court, Bharuch rejected the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Vijaybhai and Sangitaben Patel) and upheld the trial court's order directing criminal proceedings against them under IPC Sections 420, 406, 498(a), 506(2), 504, and 114 for cheating, criminal breach of trust, harassment, and criminal intimidation of the widow complainant. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence in the complainant's testimony and seven witnesses' statements that the accused, who were the in-laws of the deceased, had gained the widow's trust, obtained business documents and financial details, misappropriated funds owed to the deceased's creditors, verbally abused her, and threatened her with physical harm and defamation if she pursued the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  15. 02-Jun-2025

    Notice To Respondents

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 12-Dec-2024

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 21-Nov-2024

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 19-Oct-2024

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 19-Sep-2024

    Notice To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 30-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.Revi.Appln. No. 43/2024 Court Decision: The Sessions Court, Bharuch rejected the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Vijaybhai and Sangitaben Patel) and upheld the trial court's order directing criminal proceedings against them under IPC Sections 420, 406, 498(a), 506(2), 504, and 114 for cheating, criminal breach of trust, harassment, and criminal intimidation of the widow complainant. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence in the complainant's testimony and seven witnesses' statements that the accused, who were the in-laws of the deceased, had gained the widow's trust, obtained business documents and financial details, misappropriated funds owed to the deceased's creditors, verbally abused her, and threatened her with physical harm and defamation if she pursued the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case