NARSINHBHAI RANCHODBHAI RATHOD vs RUHUL AMIN DAVOOD ALI MALEK Advocate - J.G.PATEL — 269/2018

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBH010018232018

Filing Number

269/2018

Filing Date

31-Jul-2018

Registration No

269/2018

Registration Date

31-Jul-2018

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

2-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARSINHBHAI RANCHODBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. J.R.ROHIT

  2. 2.KHODABHAI NARSINHBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. J.R.ROHIT

  3. 3.MELABHAI NARSINHBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. J.R.ROHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUHUL AMIN DAVOOD ALI MALEK Advocate - J.G.PATEL

  2. 2.SAKIL ISMAILBHAI SAKHIDAS

    Adv. J.G.PATEL

  3. 3.UNITED INDIA INS CO LTD

    Adv. M.N.GOHIL

  4. 4.SHAILESH VALLABHBHAI PATEL

  5. 5.CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS CO LTD

    Adv. P.G.SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: MACP No. 269/2018 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 8,87,100 in compensation to the legal heirs of Lakhiben Narsinhbhai Rathod (deceased), who died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision on 21/02/2018 near Ankhi Village, Bharuch. The tribunal found both vehicle drivers equally negligent (50-50 composite negligence) and held all defendants jointly and severally liable. Key Reasoning: The deceased, aged 45 (per post-mortem report), earned Rs. 4,500/month from labour work. With 40% future prospects increment and a multiplier of 14, loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 7,05,600. Additional amounts were awarded for spousal/parental consortium (Rs. 1,45,200), funeral expenses (Rs. 18,150), and loss of estate (Rs. 18,150). Interest at 9% per annum applies from petition filing until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 21-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 13-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 15-Oct-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  16. 09-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  18. 16-Apr-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  19. 26-Mar-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  20. 05-Mar-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  22. 08-Jan-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  25. 23-Oct-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  26. 25-Sep-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 21-Aug-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  28. 24-Jul-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  29. 03-Jul-2024

    Opponents Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  30. 24-Apr-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  31. 27-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  32. 30-Jan-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  33. 13-Dec-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 25-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  35. 06-Sep-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  36. 13-Jul-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  37. 21-Jun-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  38. 05-Jun-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  39. 16-May-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  40. 01-Mar-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  41. 24-Jan-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  42. 07-Dec-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  43. 19-Oct-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  44. 06-Oct-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  45. 07-Sep-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  46. 25-Aug-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  47. 27-Jun-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  48. 20-Apr-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  49. 15-Mar-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  50. 09-Feb-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  51. 05-Jan-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  52. 11-Dec-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  53. 08-Dec-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  54. 26-Oct-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  55. 17-Sep-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  56. 16-Jul-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  57. 27-Apr-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  58. 23-Feb-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  59. 05-Jan-2021

    Applicants Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  60. 10-Nov-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  61. 06-Oct-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  62. 25-Aug-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  63. 21-Jul-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  64. 25-May-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  65. 15-Apr-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  66. 11-Mar-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    7th Addl District Judge

  67. 12-Feb-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    7th Addl District Judge

  68. 08-Jan-2020

    Applicants Evidence

    7th Addl District Judge

  69. 21-Dec-2019

    Applicants Evidence

    7th Addl District Judge

  70. 16-Dec-2019

    Issues

    7th Addl District Judge

  71. 23-Oct-2019

    Issues

    5th Addl District Judge

  72. 09-Sep-2019

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  73. 31-Jul-2019

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  74. 26-Jun-2019

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    5th Addl District Judge

  75. 08-Apr-2019

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    3rd Addl District Judge

  76. 20-Mar-2019

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  77. 20-Feb-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  78. 19-Dec-2018

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  79. 10-Oct-2018

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  80. 05-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  81. 31-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACP No. 269/2018 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 8,87,100 in compensation to the legal heirs of Lakhiben Narsinhbhai Rathod (deceased), who died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision on 21/02/2018 near Ankhi Village, Bharuch. The tribunal found both vehicle drivers equally negligent (50-50 composite negligence) and held all defendants jointly and severally liable. Key Reasoning: The deceased, aged 45 (per post-mortem report), earned Rs. 4,500/month from labour work. With 40% future prospects increment and a multiplier of 14, loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 7,05,600. Additional amounts were awarded for spousal/parental consortium (Rs. 1,45,200), funeral expenses (Rs. 18,150), and loss of estate (Rs. 18,150). Interest at 9% per annum applies from petition filing until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case