MANUBEN NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA vs MUKESHBHAI KUNJBIHARI AGRAWAL Advocate - S V PRADHAN — 144/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBH010009872022

Filing Number

144/2022

Filing Date

01-Apr-2022

Registration No

144/2022

Registration Date

01-Apr-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANUBEN NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA

    Adv. H S KHARVA

  2. 2.HETALBEN NARANBHAI CHHETRIYA

    Adv. H S KHARVA

  3. 3.MINOR SAGAR NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA

    Adv. H S KHARVA

  4. 4.MINOR SAHIL NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA

    Adv. H S KHARVA

  5. 5.MANIBEN DHANABHAI CHHETARIYA

    Adv. H S KHARVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI KUNJBIHARI AGRAWAL Advocate - S V PRADHAN

  2. 2.KALPESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI AGRAWAL

    Adv. S V PRADHAN

  3. 3.ORIENTAL INSUARANCE CO LTD

    Adv. M N GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: MANUBEN NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA v. MUKESHBHAI KUNJBIHARI AGRAWAL Tribunal Decision (Bharuch Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, April 17, 2026): The tribunal awarded Rs.56,83,466 in compensation to the legal heirs of a 47-year-old man who died in a motorcycle-car collision on February 8, 2022. The court found the car driver solely negligent, rejecting arguments that the motorcycle rider contributed to the accident. The tribunal applied standard compensation formulas including dependency loss (Rs.54,05,166), consortium awards to spouse and children (Rs.2,42,000), funeral expenses, and loss of estate, holding the driver, vehicle owner, and insurer jointly liable for full payment with 9% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 30-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 28-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 18-Jun-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 11-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 28-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 19-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 22-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 23-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 25-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 28-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 24-Jul-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  31. 24-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 15-May-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  33. 01-May-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 03-Apr-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 01-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  36. 17-Jan-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  37. 06-Dec-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 02-Nov-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  39. 04-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  40. 14-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  41. 07-Jul-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  42. 20-May-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  43. 03-Apr-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  44. 10-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  45. 20-Dec-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  46. 15-Oct-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  47. 19-Sep-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  48. 08-Aug-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  49. 13-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 01-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MANUBEN NARANBHAI CHHETARIYA v. MUKESHBHAI KUNJBIHARI AGRAWAL Tribunal Decision (Bharuch Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, April 17, 2026): The tribunal awarded Rs.56,83,466 in compensation to the legal heirs of a 47-year-old man who died in a motorcycle-car collision on February 8, 2022. The court found the car driver solely negligent, rejecting arguments that the motorcycle rider contributed to the accident. The tribunal applied standard compensation formulas including dependency loss (Rs.54,05,166), consortium awards to spouse and children (Rs.2,42,000), funeral expenses, and loss of estate, holding the driver, vehicle owner, and insurer jointly liable for full payment with 9% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case