SANTOSHKUMAR BADARIPRASHAD AGRAWAL vs KISHOR LAXMAN JADAV Advocate - S N KUNDIYANA — 148/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJBH010007762021
Filing Number
148/2021
Filing Date
01-Apr-2021
Registration No
148/2021
Registration Date
01-Apr-2021
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSHKUMAR BADARIPRASHAD AGRAWAL
Adv. C.R.INTWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHOR LAXMAN JADAV Advocate - S N KUNDIYANA
-
2.SHANKAR KAPOORCHAND BAINADE
-
3.NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD D.O-1
Adv. K.N.CHAVDA
-
4.BAJAJ ALIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD(DELETED)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: MACP 148/2021 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bharuch dismissed the claim for vehicle damage compensation. While acknowledging that truck GJ16-AU-6948 sustained damage in the accident, the tribunal found the claimant failed to prove actual loss with reliable evidence. Since the claimant had already received Rs.4,37,800 from his own insurance company (Bajaj Allianz), awarding additional compensation would violate the principle of indemnity by allowing unjust enrichment. Claims for loss of income and installment payments were rejected due to lack of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
31-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Oct-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Sep-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
01-Feb-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2021
CASE SUMMARY: MACP 148/2021 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bharuch dismissed the claim for vehicle damage compensation. While acknowledging that truck GJ16-AU-6948 sustained damage in the accident, the tribunal found the claimant failed to prove actual loss with reliable evidence. Since the claimant had already received Rs.4,37,800 from his own insurance company (Bajaj Allianz), awarding additional compensation would violate the principle of indemnity by allowing unjust enrichment. Claims for loss of income and installment payments were rejected due to lack of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts