MORKIDEVI RANCHHOD RAM vs DIPESHKUMAR HARSHADRAI RAMNANDI Advocate - K T PATEL — 72/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBH010007382023

Filing Number

72/2023

Filing Date

24-Feb-2023

Registration No

72/2023

Registration Date

24-Feb-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MORKIDEVI RANCHHOD RAM

    Adv. S L PATEL

  2. 2.MANARAM RANCHHODA RAM

  3. 3.KANTILAL RANCHHODA RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIPESHKUMAR HARSHADRAI RAMNANDI Advocate - K T PATEL

  2. 2.NILAYKUMAR ZINABHAI PATEL

    Adv. K T PATEL

  3. 3.SHRI GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

    Adv. M N GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: MACP 71/2023 and MACP 72/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to an injured motorcycle rider and the family of a deceased pillion rider following a December 2022 highway collision. The tribunal found the car driver negligent despite his criminal acquittal, holding that civil liability uses a lower "preponderance of probability" standard. The injured claimant received Rs.2,74,100 for fracture injuries and disability; the deceased's family received Rs.12,28,800 covering dependency loss, funeral expenses, and consortium compensation. Both claims were partially allowed with 9% interest from filing date, payable jointly by the driver, vehicle owner, and insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 02-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 01-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 04-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 28-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 23-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 19-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 19-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 08-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 20-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 09-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 11-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 21-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 20-Jul-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 21-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  29. 24-Apr-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  30. 04-Apr-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  31. 01-Feb-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  32. 11-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  33. 10-Oct-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  34. 04-Aug-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  35. 09-Jun-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  36. 25-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  37. 03-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 24-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MACP 71/2023 and MACP 72/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to an injured motorcycle rider and the family of a deceased pillion rider following a December 2022 highway collision. The tribunal found the car driver negligent despite his criminal acquittal, holding that civil liability uses a lower "preponderance of probability" standard. The injured claimant received Rs.2,74,100 for fracture injuries and disability; the deceased's family received Rs.12,28,800 covering dependency loss, funeral expenses, and consortium compensation. Both claims were partially allowed with 9% interest from filing date, payable jointly by the driver, vehicle owner, and insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case