MUHAMADIKRAM YUNUS AHEMAD TAILOR vs PATEL NURMAHAMAD IKBAL YUSUF — 120/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBH010007192026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

6-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUHAMADIKRAM YUNUS AHEMAD TAILOR

    Adv. M M RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL NURMAHAMAD IKBAL YUSUF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 120/2026 The appellant, Muhammad Iqram Yunus Ahemad Tailor, appealed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (dishonored cheque) recorded by the trial court on 21/11/2024. The court set aside the conviction and acquitted the appellant after both parties submitted a compromise agreement stating the dispute was amicably settled and the respondent had no objection to acquittal. The court waived compounding costs under Section 147 of the NI Act, citing Supreme Court precedent permitting such waiver in Lok Adalat settlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 120/2026 The appellant, Muhammad Iqram Yunus Ahemad Tailor, appealed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (dishonored cheque) recorded by the trial court on 21/11/2024. The court set aside the conviction and acquitted the appellant after both parties submitted a compromise agreement stating the dispute was amicably settled and the respondent had no objection to acquittal. The court waived compounding costs under Section 147 of the NI Act, citing Supreme Court precedent permitting such waiver in Lok Adalat settlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case