NIRANKUSH ANILBHAI LAHASE vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN — 217/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBH010006702026

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

6-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199027260092

Police Station

JAMBUSAR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),81,83,98(2),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRANKUSH ANILBHAI LAHASE

    Adv. R D MAHIDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 217/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition filed by Nirankush Anilbhai Lahase was REJECTED. The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge of Bharuch held that the petitioner, who served as a truck driver transporting foreign liquor, had a prima facie serious role in the prohibited alcohol smuggling case. The court found sufficient evidence linking him to co-conspirators and the recovered contraband, and determined he did not merit bail under the parity principle applied to a co-accused who received bail from the High Court, as his involvement appeared more substantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 217/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition filed by Nirankush Anilbhai Lahase was REJECTED. The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge of Bharuch held that the petitioner, who served as a truck driver transporting foreign liquor, had a prima facie serious role in the prohibited alcohol smuggling case. The court found sufficient evidence linking him to co-conspirators and the recovered contraband, and determined he did not merit bail under the parity principle applied to a co-accused who received bail from the High Court, as his involvement appeared more substantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case