RATAN AKA RAJU MAHADEV GAYAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN — 211/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010006602026
Filing Number
211/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
211/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
6-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199012250810
Police Station
BHARUCH CITY B DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RATAN AKA RAJU MAHADEV GAYAN
Adv. V S DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 211/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Ratan aka Raju Mahadev Gayan, accused of human trafficking and immoral trafficking under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and BNS provisions. The prosecution established prima facie evidence that the accused facilitated trafficking of Bangladeshi women into India through agents, housed them, and forced them into sex work across multiple cities (Surat, Ahmedabad, Mehsana), financially benefiting from the exploitation of approximately 61 rescued women. The court found the accused connected to co-accused through financial transactions and phone records, deemed the crimes serious with prior similar cases against him, and concluded bail was unjustified given flight risk and likelihood of witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 211/2026
Case Summary: 211/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Ratan aka Raju Mahadev Gayan, accused of human trafficking and immoral trafficking under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and BNS provisions. The prosecution established prima facie evidence that the accused facilitated trafficking of Bangladeshi women into India through agents, housed them, and forced them into sex work across multiple cities (Surat, Ahmedabad, Mehsana), financially benefiting from the exploitation of approximately 61 rescued women. The court found the accused connected to co-accused through financial transactions and phone records, deemed the crimes serious with prior similar cases against him, and concluded bail was unjustified given flight risk and likelihood of witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts