NEEL RAVINDRABHAI SHAH vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN — 37/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBH010006472026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEEL RAVINDRABHAI SHAH

    Adv. H L GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN

  2. 2.DEVANG NALINBHAI JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 37/2026 The Sessions Court allowed Neel Ravindrabhai Shah's criminal revision petition, quashing the trial court's condition requiring 10% cheque deposit as interim compensation for reopening cross-examination. The court found this condition violated Section 143A of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which prescribes 60-day payment timelines) and curtailed the accused's fundamental right to fair trial. The cross-examination reopening was maintained unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 37/2026 The Sessions Court allowed Neel Ravindrabhai Shah's criminal revision petition, quashing the trial court's condition requiring 10% cheque deposit as interim compensation for reopening cross-examination. The court found this condition violated Section 143A of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which prescribes 60-day payment timelines) and curtailed the accused's fundamental right to fair trial. The cross-examination reopening was maintained unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case