RAHUL AJITBHAI VASAVA vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - M.G.RATHOD — 199/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010006332026
Filing Number
199/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
199/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
2-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111990392600104
Police Station
PALEJ POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL AJITBHAI VASAVA
Adv. A M VALVI
-
2.KIRAN KALIDAS VASAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - M.G.RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge at Bharuch rejected the regular bail application filed by accused Rahul Ajitbhai Vasava and Kiran Kalidas Vasava under BNSS Section 483. The court found a prima facie case existed against them for alleged theft of zinc bottom dross plates worth ₹4,50,000 from Steelco Gujarat Limited, noting the investigation was ongoing, material evidence had been recovered, and co-accused's bail pleas had also been rejected at the same stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 199/2026
The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge at Bharuch rejected the regular bail application filed by accused Rahul Ajitbhai Vasava and Kiran Kalidas Vasava under BNSS Section 483. The court found a prima facie case existed against them for alleged theft of zinc bottom dross plates worth ₹4,50,000 from Steelco Gujarat Limited, noting the investigation was ongoing, material evidence had been recovered, and co-accused's bail pleas had also been rejected at the same stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts