ARVINDBHAI LALJIBHAI VASANI vs CHEIF OFFICER BHARUCH NAGAR SEVA SADAN — 27/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O33,R1,R2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJBH010006132026
Filing Number
27/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVINDBHAI LALJIBHAI VASANI
Adv. S R RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHEIF OFFICER BHARUCH NAGAR SEVA SADAN
-
2.JAGDISHBHAI AKA LALABHAI BABLABHAI MISTRY
-
3.STATE OF GUJARAT GN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The Principal District Judge at Bharuch allowed Arvindbhai Vasani's application to sue as an indigent person and waived the court fees of Rs. 26,350 for filing an appeal against a partially allowed civil suit involving a claim of Rs. 12,00,000. The court held that every citizen has a right to access justice regardless of financial means, and that the applicant's substantial losses and medical expenses justified exemption from court fees, with any future compensation being subject to fee deduction anyway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Notice To Respondents
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2026
The Principal District Judge at Bharuch allowed Arvindbhai Vasani's application to sue as an indigent person and waived the court fees of Rs. 26,350 for filing an appeal against a partially allowed civil suit involving a claim of Rs. 12,00,000. The court held that every citizen has a right to access justice regardless of financial means, and that the applicant's substantial losses and medical expenses justified exemption from court fees, with any future compensation being subject to fee deduction anyway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts