KAMLA PRASAD RAJESH HARINARAYAN SANTUPRASAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 188/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBH010006092026

Case disposed

Filing Number

188/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199010250864

Police Station

BHARUCH CITY A DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

KAMLA PRASAD RAJESH HARINARAYAN SANTUPRASAD

Adv. S A PATEL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 188/2026 Court Decision: The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, rejected the bail application of petitioner Kamla Prasad Rajesh Harinarayan Santuprasad in a serious criminal case. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence linking the accused to charges under IPC sections 103(1), 311, 238(A), 61, and 123 (murder and robbery). The prosecution presented credible evidence including CCTV footage, mobile CDR records, identification parades, victim's family testimonies, and recovered stolen goods. The judge determined that given the heinous nature of the offense (premeditated murder and looting), the accused's origin in Uttar Pradesh (flight risk), and other co-accused still at large, bail could prejudice the trial and compromise witness safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 188/2026 Court Decision: The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, rejected the bail application of petitioner Kamla Prasad Rajesh Harinarayan Santuprasad in a serious criminal case. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence linking the accused to charges under IPC sections 103(1), 311, 238(A), 61, and 123 (murder and robbery). The prosecution presented credible evidence including CCTV footage, mobile CDR records, identification parades, victim's family testimonies, and recovered stolen goods. The judge determined that given the heinous nature of the offense (premeditated murder and looting), the accused's origin in Uttar Pradesh (flight risk), and other co-accused still at large, bail could prejudice the trial and compromise witness safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case