KAMLA PRASAD RAJESH HARINARAYAN SANTUPRASAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 188/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010006092026
Filing Number
188/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199010250864
Police Station
BHARUCH CITY A DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMLA PRASAD RAJESH HARINARAYAN SANTUPRASAD
Adv. S A PATEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 188/2026 Court Decision: The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, rejected the bail application of petitioner Kamla Prasad Rajesh Harinarayan Santuprasad in a serious criminal case. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence linking the accused to charges under IPC sections 103(1), 311, 238(A), 61, and 123 (murder and robbery). The prosecution presented credible evidence including CCTV footage, mobile CDR records, identification parades, victim's family testimonies, and recovered stolen goods. The judge determined that given the heinous nature of the offense (premeditated murder and looting), the accused's origin in Uttar Pradesh (flight risk), and other co-accused still at large, bail could prejudice the trial and compromise witness safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 188/2026 Court Decision: The Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, rejected the bail application of petitioner Kamla Prasad Rajesh Harinarayan Santuprasad in a serious criminal case. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence linking the accused to charges under IPC sections 103(1), 311, 238(A), 61, and 123 (murder and robbery). The prosecution presented credible evidence including CCTV footage, mobile CDR records, identification parades, victim's family testimonies, and recovered stolen goods. The judge determined that given the heinous nature of the offense (premeditated murder and looting), the accused's origin in Uttar Pradesh (flight risk), and other co-accused still at large, bail could prejudice the trial and compromise witness safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts