TEJENDARSING AKA ROHIT RAKBIRSING SARDAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - M.G.RATHOD — 187/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBH010006062026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

2-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199010250905

Police Station

BHARUCH CITY A DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305(a),331(3),331(4),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEJENDARSING AKA ROHIT RAKBIRSING SARDAR

    Adv. M Y MEMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - M.G.RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed Tejindarsing's second bail application under Section 483 BNSS in a burglary case. The applicant was accused of theft of gold and silver ornaments worth Rs. 3,83,000 but argued he was falsely implicated with no recovery from him. The court found no change in circumstances since the first bail application was dismissed on merits, and noted the applicant has 13 prior criminal cases involving similar offenses across Gujarat, indicating he is a habitual offender with likelihood of reoffending and absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed Tejindarsing's second bail application under Section 483 BNSS in a burglary case. The applicant was accused of theft of gold and silver ornaments worth Rs. 3,83,000 but argued he was falsely implicated with no recovery from him. The court found no change in circumstances since the first bail application was dismissed on merits, and noted the applicant has 13 prior criminal cases involving similar offenses across Gujarat, indicating he is a habitual offender with likelihood of reoffending and absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case