JISHAN RAUF MANSURI vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 183/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBH010006012026

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

6-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199038260028

Police Station

NABIPUR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54,317(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JISHAN RAUF MANSURI

    Adv. A M SAIYED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court decided that the petitioner's land claim is liable to be rejected as the respondent (State of Gujarat) demonstrated superior title to the disputed property. The judgment upholds that subsequent land recordings and registrations in favor of the State, made after initial grants to the petitioner, take precedence when there is conflicting evidence regarding land ownership. The court ordered dismissal of the petition on the grounds that the State's documentary evidence sufficiently established its legal claim to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided that the petitioner's land claim is liable to be rejected as the respondent (State of Gujarat) demonstrated superior title to the disputed property. The judgment upholds that subsequent land recordings and registrations in favor of the State, made after initial grants to the petitioner, take precedence when there is conflicting evidence regarding land ownership. The court ordered dismissal of the petition on the grounds that the State's documentary evidence sufficiently established its legal claim to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case