JISHAN RAUF MANSURI vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 183/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010006012026
Filing Number
183/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199038260028
Police Station
NABIPUR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JISHAN RAUF MANSURI
Adv. A M SAIYED
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decided that the petitioner's land claim is liable to be rejected as the respondent (State of Gujarat) demonstrated superior title to the disputed property. The judgment upholds that subsequent land recordings and registrations in favor of the State, made after initial grants to the petitioner, take precedence when there is conflicting evidence regarding land ownership. The court ordered dismissal of the petition on the grounds that the State's documentary evidence sufficiently established its legal claim to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decided that the petitioner's land claim is liable to be rejected as the respondent (State of Gujarat) demonstrated superior title to the disputed property. The judgment upholds that subsequent land recordings and registrations in favor of the State, made after initial grants to the petitioner, take precedence when there is conflicting evidence regarding land ownership. The court ordered dismissal of the petition on the grounds that the State's documentary evidence sufficiently established its legal claim to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts