ILYASBHAI ALIHUSEN MALEK vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 169/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010005232026
Filing Number
169/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
169/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199011240974
Police Station
BHARUCH RURAL POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ILYASBHAI ALIHUSEN MALEK
Adv. S R ZANZARUKIYA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The court approved bail for petitioner Ilyasbhai Alihusen Malek in connection with NDPS Act charges, ordering his release on bail conditions on grounds that he should be released on Day 30 of his custody period to meet family financial responsibilities. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious drug trafficking charges exist against the petitioner, his continued detention poses hardship to his wife and two children who depend on him for livelihood. The court determined that the reasons cited for bail—family welfare during his absence—were valid, and that releasing him on bail would not obstruct justice given the custody already served and available sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The court approved bail for petitioner Ilyasbhai Alihusen Malek in connection with NDPS Act charges, ordering his release on bail conditions on grounds that he should be released on Day 30 of his custody period to meet family financial responsibilities. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious drug trafficking charges exist against the petitioner, his continued detention poses hardship to his wife and two children who depend on him for livelihood. The court determined that the reasons cited for bail—family welfare during his absence—were valid, and that releasing him on bail would not obstruct justice given the custody already served and available sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts