ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE vs SAMIR DILIPBHAI VALODKAR — 37/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21RULE5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJBH010004452026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

2-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21RULE5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE

    Adv. S M MALIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAMIR DILIPBHAI VALODKAR

  2. 2.MAGANBHAI SHANABHAI NAIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bharuch transferred the case to the Vadodara tribunal based on the respondents' residence and property location in Vadodara rather than Bharuch. The application was disposed of accordingly, with directions for the petitioner's advocate to receive a handbido. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 11-May-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply To Objection

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bharuch transferred the case to the Vadodara tribunal based on the respondents' residence and property location in Vadodara rather than Bharuch. The application was disposed of accordingly, with directions for the petitioner's advocate to receive a handbido. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case