MINOR AJAY HARSINGBHAI MEDA THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN MEDA HARSINGBHAI BIJIYABHAI vs BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK — 35/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 16th June 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJBH010004412026
Filing Number
35/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MINOR AJAY HARSINGBHAI MEDA THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN MEDA HARSINGBHAI BIJIYABHAI
Adv. N S MAKRANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Order
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the minor applicant's request for premature withdrawal of Rs. 1,00,000 from a fixed deposit created under a prior motor accident award. The tribunal found insufficient grounds for early withdrawal, noting the applicant failed to provide specific documentation of claimed educational or medical expenses. The tribunal upheld the settled legal principle that fixed deposits protect vulnerable claimants from misusing compensation funds and ensure long-term financial security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
29-May-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
11-May-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2026
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the minor applicant's request for premature withdrawal of Rs. 1,00,000 from a fixed deposit created under a prior motor accident award. The tribunal found insufficient grounds for early withdrawal, noting the applicant failed to provide specific documentation of claimed educational or medical expenses. The tribunal upheld the settled legal principle that fixed deposits protect vulnerable claimants from misusing compensation funds and ensure long-term financial security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts