SALMAN LIYAKAT KHILAJI vs STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR — 112/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBH010003372026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
6-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199012250631
Police Station
BHARUCH CITY B DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SALMAN LIYAKAT KHILAJI
Adv. A M SAIYED
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT GN Advocate - J J PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA 112/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Salman Liyakat Khilaji's application seeking return of a seized VIVO V-29 mobile phone on interim custody basis under BNS Section 497. The court found that the mobile phone is crucial evidence in an ongoing NDPS case, as it has been sent to FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) in Surat for examination and the charge sheet has not yet been filed. The court determined that releasing the phone prematurely would not be justified and could compromise the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
5th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Case Summary: CRMA 112/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Salman Liyakat Khilaji's application seeking return of a seized VIVO V-29 mobile phone on interim custody basis under BNS Section 497. The court found that the mobile phone is crucial evidence in an ongoing NDPS case, as it has been sent to FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) in Surat for examination and the charge sheet has not yet been filed. The court determined that releasing the phone prematurely would not be justified and could compromise the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts