RATILAL FOGATBHAI VASAVA vs MONU SHYAMANARAYAN SING — 26/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJBH010003162023
Filing Number
26/2023
Filing Date
30-Jan-2023
Registration No
26/2023
Registration Date
30-Jan-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RATILAL FOGATBHAI VASAVA
Adv. C R INTWALA
-
2.VIJAY RATILAL VASAVA
Adv. C R INTWALA
-
3.GEETABEN NILESH VASAVA
Adv. C R INTWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MONU SHYAMANARAYAN SING
-
2.ASHOK KUMAR OMPRAKASH SHARMA
-
3.NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD D.O-1
Adv. N R MODI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: MACP/26/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Bharuch awarded Rs. 10,91,420 compensation to the legal heirs of Sukiben Ratilal Vasava, who died in a road accident on October 30, 2022, when a Hiwa truck driven negligently knocked her down. The tribunal found the truck driver solely liable for rash and negligent driving, with the truck owner and insurance company jointly responsible for payment, though the insurance company can later recover the amount from the vehicle owner due to the truck's invalid permit violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
21-Dec-2024
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Applicants Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-May-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
16-May-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2023
Case Summary: MACP/26/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Bharuch awarded Rs. 10,91,420 compensation to the legal heirs of Sukiben Ratilal Vasava, who died in a road accident on October 30, 2022, when a Hiwa truck driven negligently knocked her down. The tribunal found the truck driver solely liable for rash and negligent driving, with the truck owner and insurance company jointly responsible for payment, though the insurance company can later recover the amount from the vehicle owner due to the truck's invalid permit violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts