STATE OF GUJARAT vs AEHMADKHAN at SAHARUKH SOKATKHAN PATHAN Advocate - K K DESAI — 4/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C),22(C),25,29(1). Status: Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application Next hearing 29-Jul-2026 this date has passed

NDPS - SPECIAL CASE - NDPS

CNR: GJBH010002372025

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

03-Feb-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

03-Feb-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHARUCH

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199010240808

Police Station

BHARUCH CITY A DIV. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C),22(C),25,29(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. J J PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AEHMADKHAN at SAHARUKH SOKATKHAN PATHAN Advocate - K K DESAI

  2. 2.GULAMFARID S/O ABDULLAH PATEL

    Adv. M C PARMAR

  3. 3.AAFTAB @ APPU S/O SIKANDARBHAI MACHUMIYA SHAIKH

    Adv. I I PATEL

  4. 4.ZAHIR @ BHURIYO @ PITAR SIKANDARBH

    Adv. F F MEMAN

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 12-May-2026

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 01-May-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: NDPS Case No. 04/2025 Outcome: Discharge petition DISMISSED The Special NDPS Court in Bharuch rejected the discharge petition filed by accused #4 (Zahir alias Bhuriya alias Pital Sikander Sheikh). The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with chargesheet against the accused under NDPS Act sections 8(c), 22(c), 25, and 29(1). The accused was connected to the case through co-accused confessions, mobile call records (CDR) showing contact with other accused, and audio-video recordings of interrogations. The court determined that adequate prima facie evidence existed to frame charges and declined to discharge the accused at this stage. Order Date: 18 April 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 18-Apr-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 15-Apr-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 08-Apr-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 25-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  16. 25-Feb-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  17. 11-Feb-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  18. 29-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  19. 22-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  20. 17-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  21. 03-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 24-Dec-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  23. 11-Dec-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  24. 27-Nov-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  25. 14-Nov-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  26. 01-Nov-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  27. 18-Oct-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  28. 09-Oct-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  29. 25-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  30. 12-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  31. 30-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  32. 20-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  33. 06-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  34. 23-Jul-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  35. 09-Jul-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  36. 25-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  37. 11-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  38. 28-May-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  39. 14-May-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  40. 30-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  41. 15-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  42. 01-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  43. 18-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  44. 04-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  45. 01-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  46. 15-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 03-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NDPS Case No. 04/2025 Outcome: Discharge petition DISMISSED The Special NDPS Court in Bharuch rejected the discharge petition filed by accused #4 (Zahir alias Bhuriya alias Pital Sikander Sheikh). The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with chargesheet against the accused under NDPS Act sections 8(c), 22(c), 25, and 29(1). The accused was connected to the case through co-accused confessions, mobile call records (CDR) showing contact with other accused, and audio-video recordings of interrogations. The court determined that adequate prima facie evidence existed to frame charges and declined to discharge the accused at this stage. Order Date: 18 April 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case