PATEL NANJIBHAI DHANJIBHAI vs THE STATE Advocate - T K RATHOD — 29/2023

Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE

CNR: GJAR070025462023

Filing Number

29/2023

Filing Date

25-Nov-2023

Registration No

29/2023

Registration Date

25-Nov-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL NANJIBHAI DHANJIBHAI

    Adv. S R BHARWAD

  2. 2.PATEL CHIMANBHAI DHANJIBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE Advocate - T K RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 29/2023 Case: LAR Case No. 29/2023 (Consolidated with Cases 21-30/2023) Petitioners: Patel Nanjibhai Dhanjibhai and Patel Chimanbhai Dhanjibhai Respondent: The State Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bayad Date: 24/04/2025 Decision The court partially allowed the petitioners' Land Acquisition Reference (LAR) case under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, awarding additional compensation of Rs. 187.51 per square meter beyond the original award, with 12% interest for the first year and 15% thereafter, plus statutory benefits and costs. Key Findings The court determined that the original compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer was inadequate for agricultural land acquired for the Mazum Irrigation Scheme near Modasa. Based on comparable land valuations in neighboring villages (Shika) where similar acquisitions occurred, the court enhanced the market rate determination and ordered the state to pay differential compensation with accrued interest and statutory solatium. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 13-Feb-2026

    Filing Of Objections

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 30-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 09-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 19-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 14-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Appellant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 13-Jun-2025

    Witness List

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 30-May-2025

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 28-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  33. 24-Jan-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  34. 20-Dec-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  35. 29-Nov-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  36. 25-Nov-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  37. 11-Nov-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 08-Nov-2024

    Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 18-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 20-Sep-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 16-Aug-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  42. 19-Jul-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  43. 21-Jun-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  44. 19-Apr-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  45. 15-Mar-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  46. 09-Feb-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  47. 12-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 25-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 29/2023 Case: LAR Case No. 29/2023 (Consolidated with Cases 21-30/2023) Petitioners: Patel Nanjibhai Dhanjibhai and Patel Chimanbhai Dhanjibhai Respondent: The State Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bayad Date: 24/04/2025 Decision The court partially allowed the petitioners' Land Acquisition Reference (LAR) case under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, awarding additional compensation of Rs. 187.51 per square meter beyond the original award, with 12% interest for the first year and 15% thereafter, plus statutory benefits and costs. Key Findings The court determined that the original compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer was inadequate for agricultural land acquired for the Mazum Irrigation Scheme near Modasa. Based on comparable land valuations in neighboring villages (Shika) where similar acquisitions occurred, the court enhanced the market rate determination and ordered the state to pay differential compensation with accrued interest and statutory solatium. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case