Government of Gujarat vs KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA — 1774/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,353(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR070023442025
Filing Number
1774/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
1774/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAYAD
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50219
Police Station
BAYAD POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA
-
2.NIRUBEN W/O SHANABHAI CHUTHABHAI BARIYA
-
3.AKASHBHAI (ALIAS) RAJUBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA
-
4.MANISHABEN W/O KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA
Adv. S D ZALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1774/2025
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts