Government of Gujarat vs KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA — 1774/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,353(3),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070023442025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1774/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

1774/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

50219

Police Station

BAYAD POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),352,353(3),54,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA

NIRUBEN W/O SHANABHAI CHUTHABHAI BARIYA

AKASHBHAI (ALIAS) RAJUBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA

MANISHABEN W/O KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA

Adv. S D ZALA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

24-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case