Government of Gujarat vs KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA — 1774/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,353(3),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR070023442025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1774/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2025
Registration No
1774/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAYAD
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50219
Police Station
BAYAD POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA Advocate - S D ZALA
NIRUBEN W/O SHANABHAI CHUTHABHAI BARIYA
AKASHBHAI (ALIAS) RAJUBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA
MANISHABEN W/O KIRANBHAI SHANABHAI BARIYA
Adv. S D ZALA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 24-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove they jointly assaulted the complainant's wife. The court noted that the prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent, unsupported by documentary evidence, and that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately corroborate the charges. The court ruled that without compelling and reliable evidence of the alleged offense, the accused could not be held guilty and accordingly directed their acquittal under the direction of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts