Government of Gujarat vs VIKRAMSINH LALSINH Advocate - M M ZALA — 1687/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR070022112025
Filing Number
1687/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
1687/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAYAD
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
287
Police Station
AMBALIYARA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAMSINH LALSINH Advocate - M M ZALA
-
2.LALSINH PUNJSINH ZALA
-
3.PRAKASHSINH DILIPSINH ZALA
-
4.DILIPKUMAR HARGOVINDBHAI PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gambling Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹800 (₹200 per accused) with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's plea of guilt, his status as a family-dependent person with dependents, and that it was his first offense, in the interest of justice and society's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1687/2025
The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gambling Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹800 (₹200 per accused) with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's plea of guilt, his status as a family-dependent person with dependents, and that it was his first offense, in the interest of justice and society's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts