Government of Gujarat vs VIKRAMSINH LALSINH Advocate - M M ZALA — 1687/2025

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070022112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1687/2025

Filing Date

06-10-2025

Registration No

1687/2025

Registration Date

06-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

AMBALIYARA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VIKRAMSINH LALSINH Advocate - M M ZALA

LALSINH PUNJSINH ZALA

PRAKASHSINH DILIPSINH ZALA

DILIPKUMAR HARGOVINDBHAI PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

04-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

31-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gambling Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹800 (₹200 per accused) with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's plea of guilt, his status as a family-dependent person with dependents, and that it was his first offense, in the interest of justice and society's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gambling Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹800 (₹200 per accused) with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's plea of guilt, his status as a family-dependent person with dependents, and that it was his first offense, in the interest of justice and society's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case