Government of Gujarat vs SHIVSINH ARJANSINH ZALA Advocate - A J PARMAR — 1686/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(2)(3),324(4),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070022082025

Filing Number

1686/2025

Filing Date

06-Oct-2025

Registration No

1686/2025

Registration Date

06-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

23-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

301

Police Station

SATHAMBA POLICE STATION - ARVALLI MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(2)(3),324(4),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVSINH ARJANSINH ZALA Advocate - A J PARMAR

  2. 2.KARANSINH SHIVSINH ZALA

  3. 3.GALIBEN W/O SHIVSINH ARJANSINH ZALA

    Adv. A J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: C.C. NO. 1686-2025 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the three accused (Shivsinh Arjansinh Zala, Karansinh Shivsinh Zala, and Galiben) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 324(4), and 54, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of assault, wrongful restraint, and extortion of Rs. 15,000 at a dairy cooperative in Motipura village on 08/08/2024. The court noted the complainant (government prosecutor) failed to submit specific evidence and that conflicting statements undermined the prosecution case, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) CRPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 21-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 01-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 15-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1686/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. NO. 1686-2025 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad acquitted the three accused (Shivsinh Arjansinh Zala, Karansinh Shivsinh Zala, and Galiben) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 324(4), and 54, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of assault, wrongful restraint, and extortion of Rs. 15,000 at a dairy cooperative in Motipura village on 08/08/2024. The court noted the complainant (government prosecutor) failed to submit specific evidence and that conflicting statements undermined the prosecution case, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) CRPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case