DHIRAJKUMAR KANTIBHAI PATEL vs SOLANKI SHANSINH GALESINH — 41/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,39,. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 04th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAR070018892024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

41/2024

Filing Date

10-07-2024

Registration No

41/2024

Registration Date

10-07-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 38,39,
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 151,

Petitioner(s)

DHIRAJKUMAR KANTIBHAI PATEL

Adv. S C CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

SOLANKI SHANSINH GALESINH

SOLANKI RAMANSINH GALESINH

SOLANKI PUJIBEN WD/O. GALESINH

SOLANKI TEJABEN GALESINH

SOLANKI VATINABEN GALESINH

SOLANKI LILABEN GALESINH

SOLANKI SAMDHARBEN WD/O.KANTISINH

SOLANKI KAILESHBEN KANTISINH

SOLANKI PRAVINSINH KANTISINH

SOLANKI SHOBHNABEN KANTISINH

MALSINH JALUJI SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

04-05-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

10-03-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

10-02-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

01-01-2026

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
ORDER

The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against an R.P.A.D.L. (likely a municipal/administrative matter) after finding that the plaintiff failed to appear and the case had already been resolved. The court proceeded based on the plaintiff's pursuit record referenced in Section 33, dismissing the pending claim with applicable court fees charged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against an R.P.A.D.L. (likely a municipal/administrative matter) after finding that the plaintiff failed to appear and the case had already been resolved. The court proceeded based on the plaintiff's pursuit record referenced in Section 33, dismissing the pending claim with applicable court fees charged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case