BHUPENDRA SHANTILAL PATEL vs KIRITSINH DHANESINH CHAUHAN — 1/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAR070008722023
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
04-Feb-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
04-Feb-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAYAD
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUPENDRA SHANTILAL PATEL
Adv. S D PATEL
-
2.MAGANBHAI BALUBHAI SUHAGLA
Adv. S D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRITSINH DHANESINH CHAUHAN
-
2.ANITA KIRITSINH CHAUHAN
-
3.DHANESINH AJITISINH CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioners' (Bhupendra Shantilal Patel and Maganbhai Balubhai Suhagla) claim for default due to lack of prosecution. The court found that despite being provided adequate time and opportunity to pursue their case, the petitioners failed to appear or take any action to advance their suit, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. The dismissal was ordered on March 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Notice To Respondents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Notice To Respondents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Dec-2025
Notice To Respondents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Nov-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Sep-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Sep-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Aug-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jul-2025
Notice To Complainant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Nov-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Oct-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Sep-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Aug-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Apr-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jan-2024
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Dec-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Oct-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Sep-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Aug-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jun-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Apr-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Mar-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2023
Appearance Of Respondents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2023
The court dismissed the petitioners' (Bhupendra Shantilal Patel and Maganbhai Balubhai Suhagla) claim for default due to lack of prosecution. The court found that despite being provided adequate time and opportunity to pursue their case, the petitioners failed to appear or take any action to advance their suit, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. The dismissal was ordered on March 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts