ANILGIRI CHANDUGIRI GOSWAMI vs LALABHAI BABUBHAI VADI Advocate - K M CHAUHAN — 599/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070008232025

Filing Number

599/2025

Filing Date

19-Apr-2025

Registration No

599/2025

Registration Date

19-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANILGIRI CHANDUGIRI GOSWAMI

    Adv. S R BALOCH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALABHAI BABUBHAI VADI Advocate - K M CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Bayad Court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹1,00,000 that was dishonored. The court found that the complainant (plaintiff) had established all essential elements: a valid cheque was issued for lawful consideration, it was returned due to insufficient funds, and proper legal notice was served. Sentencing the accused to one year imprisonment and ordering compensation of ₹1,00,000 to the complainant, the court emphasized that the law applies equally to all and misconduct cannot evade justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    For Arguement of Asscused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 19-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 19-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 599/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Bayad Court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹1,00,000 that was dishonored. The court found that the complainant (plaintiff) had established all essential elements: a valid cheque was issued for lawful consideration, it was returned due to insufficient funds, and proper legal notice was served. Sentencing the accused to one year imprisonment and ordering compensation of ₹1,00,000 to the complainant, the court emphasized that the law applies equally to all and misconduct cannot evade justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case