Government of Gujarat vs KIRANSINH BHAKTISINH SOLANKI Advocate - R R SONERI — 386/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070004722026

Filing Number

386/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

386/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0498

Police Station

SATHAMBA POLICE STATION - ARVALLI MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRANSINH BHAKTISINH SOLANKI Advocate - R R SONERI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act and Section 98(2) IPC for an alcohol-related offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, family responsibilities, remorse, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and simple imprisonment, rather than maximum punishment, emphasizing that the family should not suffer for the accused's crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 386/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act and Section 98(2) IPC for an alcohol-related offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, family responsibilities, remorse, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and simple imprisonment, rather than maximum punishment, emphasizing that the family should not suffer for the accused's crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case