Government of Gujarat vs KIRANSINH BHAKTISINH SOLANKI Advocate - R R SONERI — 386/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR070004722026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
386/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
386/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAYAD
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
0498
Police Station
SATHAMBA POLICE STATION - ARVALLI MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRANSINH BHAKTISINH SOLANKI Advocate - R R SONERI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act and Section 98(2) IPC for an alcohol-related offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, family responsibilities, remorse, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and simple imprisonment, rather than maximum punishment, emphasizing that the family should not suffer for the accused's crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act and Section 98(2) IPC for an alcohol-related offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, family responsibilities, remorse, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and simple imprisonment, rather than maximum punishment, emphasizing that the family should not suffer for the accused's crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts