DARJI SURESHKUMAR MANGALDAS I/C OF THE SATHAMBA PEOPLES CO.OPP.BANK LTD. vs ZAZ AMIRHUSSAIN MAHAMADRAFIK Advocate - K M CHAUHAN — 13/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR070000272026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAYAD

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DARJI SURESHKUMAR MANGALDAS I/C OF THE SATHAMBA PEOPLES CO.OPP.BANK LTD.

    Adv. N C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZAZ AMIRHUSSAIN MAHAMADRAFIK Advocate - K M CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition after finding that the dispute between the parties had been settled. The court noted that since a settlement was reached, there was no valid reason to continue proceedings, and accordingly ordered the case to be closed with costs imposed on the petitioner in the lower court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition after finding that the dispute between the parties had been settled. The court noted that since a settlement was reached, there was no valid reason to continue proceedings, and accordingly ordered the case to be closed with costs imposed on the petitioner in the lower court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case