THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KALUSINH HIRSINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI — 1179/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060014922025

Filing Number

1179/2025

Filing Date

31-Dec-2025

Registration No

1179/2025

Registration Date

31-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50768

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALUSINH HIRSINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kalusinh Hirsinh Rathod (CC 1179/2025) The court discharged the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(b), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case due to lack of credible witness corroboration. The independent panchas (witnesses) who were present during the liquor seizure did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the evidence relied solely on uncorroborated police testimony, which is insufficient to sustain a conviction in seizure cases where panchas' presence is mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 31-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1179/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kalusinh Hirsinh Rathod (CC 1179/2025) The court discharged the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(b), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case due to lack of credible witness corroboration. The independent panchas (witnesses) who were present during the liquor seizure did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the evidence relied solely on uncorroborated police testimony, which is insufficient to sustain a conviction in seizure cases where panchas' presence is mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case