THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI — 1177/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060014902025
Filing Number
1177/2025
Filing Date
31-12-2025
Registration No
1177/2025
Registration Date
31-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50759
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAYESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 1177/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Jayeshbhai Kalabhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by credible evidence. The court held that independent witness (pancha) testimony failed to corroborate the police seizure of illegal liquor, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that when searches require mandatory pancha witnesses under prohibition law rules, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Here, the panchas neither confirmed the seizure details nor provided independent evidence, the sample collection procedures were not properly followed, and critical procedural requirements were violated, leaving reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 1177/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Jayeshbhai Kalabhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by credible evidence. The court held that independent witness (pancha) testimony failed to corroborate the police seizure of illegal liquor, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that when searches require mandatory pancha witnesses under prohibition law rules, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Here, the panchas neither confirmed the seizure details nor provided independent evidence, the sample collection procedures were not properly followed, and critical procedural requirements were violated, leaving reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts