THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI — 1177/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060014902025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1177/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2025

Registration No

1177/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

50759

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A),(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAYESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

15-05-2026

Disposed

06-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC No. 1177/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Jayeshbhai Kalabhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by credible evidence. The court held that independent witness (pancha) testimony failed to corroborate the police seizure of illegal liquor, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that when searches require mandatory pancha witnesses under prohibition law rules, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Here, the panchas neither confirmed the seizure details nor provided independent evidence, the sample collection procedures were not properly followed, and critical procedural requirements were violated, leaving reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 1177/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Jayeshbhai Kalabhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by credible evidence. The court held that independent witness (pancha) testimony failed to corroborate the police seizure of illegal liquor, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that when searches require mandatory pancha witnesses under prohibition law rules, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Here, the panchas neither confirmed the seizure details nor provided independent evidence, the sample collection procedures were not properly followed, and critical procedural requirements were violated, leaving reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case