THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VADIBHAI JUJARBHAI RATHOD Advocate - H M THAKOR — 1131/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060014312025
Filing Number
1131/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
1131/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50860
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VADIBHAI JUJARBHAI RATHOD Advocate - H M THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CC No. 1131/2025 State of Gujarat vs. Vadibhai Jujarbhai Rathod The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 400. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchas (witnesses) present during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's version and the required procedural formalities under the Liquor Sample Rules, 2012 (including FSL analysis reports) were not properly followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1131/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 1131/2025 State of Gujarat vs. Vadibhai Jujarbhai Rathod The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 400. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchas (witnesses) present during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's version and the required procedural formalities under the Liquor Sample Rules, 2012 (including FSL analysis reports) were not properly followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts