THE STATE OF GUAJRAT vs JAGATSINH AMARSINH PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI — 1076/2024

Judegement

Summary of Case 1076/2024 The court acquitted accused Jagatsinh Amarsinh Parmar of liquor prohibition charges, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to lack of corroboration from independent witnesses (panchas). The court noted that the panchas who were present during the seizure either denied their involvement or could not support the prosecution's version, and no proper forensic analysis report was submitted as required by law. Applying established precedent that conviction in prohibition cases requires independent corroboration beyond police testimony, the court discharged the accused in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 1076/2024