SNEHAL AMRATLAL THEKADI SWASTIK ENGINEERING VARKAS vs SAVARIYA MICRONOUS LLP — 1013/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060012912025

Filing Number

1013/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

1013/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SNEHAL AMRATLAL THEKADI SWASTIK ENGINEERING VARKAS

    Adv. N P JAYSWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAVARIYA MICRONOUS LLP

  2. 2.CHHAGANLAL KALAL

  3. 3.BABULAL KALAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court permitted the petitioner Snehal Amratlal Thekadi Swastik Engineering to withdraw the criminal case (under IPC Section 138) against respondents Savariya Micronous LLP and others, as the parties had reached settlement and the respondent had made full payment of the disputed cheque amount. The court accordingly allowed withdrawal of the case, discharged the accused, and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the proceedings under CrPC Section 257. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1013/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court permitted the petitioner Snehal Amratlal Thekadi Swastik Engineering to withdraw the criminal case (under IPC Section 138) against respondents Savariya Micronous LLP and others, as the parties had reached settlement and the respondent had made full payment of the disputed cheque amount. The court accordingly allowed withdrawal of the case, discharged the accused, and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the proceedings under CrPC Section 257. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case