GAJANAND ENTERPRISES PROPRAITOR SMIT ANILKUMAR PATEL vs AYUBMIYA DAUADBHAI KALAL Advocate - N K BHARVAD — 950/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060012152025

Filing Number

950/2025

Filing Date

01-Nov-2025

Registration No

950/2025

Registration Date

01-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJANAND ENTERPRISES PROPRAITOR SMIT ANILKUMAR PATEL

    Adv. Y M PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AYUBMIYA DAUADBHAI KALAL Advocate - N K BHARVAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the FIR (Case A-12) against the respondent, finding that the accused had already paid the cheque amount to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the complainant's claim. The court granted permission to withdraw the criminal prosecution under Section 257 of the CrPC 1973, acquitted the accused, and set aside the charges registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 950/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the FIR (Case A-12) against the respondent, finding that the accused had already paid the cheque amount to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the complainant's claim. The court granted permission to withdraw the criminal prosecution under Section 257 of the CrPC 1973, acquitted the accused, and set aside the charges registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case